H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillaume Raoux vs David Prinosil H2H: 2-4

David Prinosil holds a 4–2 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while David Prinosil leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #84 7-6(3) 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #273 Match data Jun 27, 2000* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Prinosil #79 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #73 Match data Feb 13, 1999* QF St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Prinosil #49 3-4 (ret.) Guillaume Raoux #100 Match data Apr 11, 1997* R16 Hong Kong Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Guillaume Raoux #109 7-6(6) 6-4 David Prinosil #45 Match data Mar 14, 1997* R16 Copenhagen World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Prinosil #69 3-6 6-3 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #103 Match data Sep 28, 1995* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Guillaume Raoux #75 7-5 6-2 David Prinosil #113 Match data Mar 3, 1994* R32 Copenhagen ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Prinosil #66 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 Guillaume Raoux #96 Match data Oct 15, 1993* R16 Bolzano ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillaume Raoux David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2
25 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2
26 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2
27 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillaume Raoux David Prinosil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
25 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9% — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillaume Raoux David Prinosil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8%
21 1991 37/39 5.7 3.5 51.1% 72.6% 48.3% 53.7% 42.7% 60.7% 36.1% 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1%
22 1992 28/30 4.3 3.3 52.5% 71.6% 50.9% 61.6% 49.3% 61.8% 37.9% 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1%
23 1993 48/55 4.8 2.9 51.0% 74.0% 52.3% 58.5% 44.4% 63.1% 39.3% 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6%
24 1994 34/35 4.2 3.2 52.9% 72.1% 48.9% 54.2% 36.7% 61.2% 36.4% 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0%
25 1995 38/39 5.1 2.9 50.3% 72.5% 50.6% 58.8% 45.0% 61.8% 35.5% 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7%
26 1996 36/43 6.3 2.9 51.8% 75.4% 53.5% 59.8% 46.9% 65.0% 35.4% 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1%
27 1997 45/52 5.2 2.7 55.6% 74.8% 53.4% 55.0% 38.6% 65.6% 35.4% 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4%
28 1998 45/51 3.7 2.4 55.7% 70.5% 53.7% 63.3% 39.9% 63.2% 33.6% 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3%
29 1999 26/29 4.9 3.7 50.3% 70.5% 53.1% 61.5% 36.8% 61.8% 32.0% 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1%
30 2000 2/2 5.5 2.5 51.7% 70.6% 55.9% 75.0% 21.6% 63.6% 35.1% 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8%
Career — 339/398 4.9 3.0 52.5% 72.8% 51.8% 58.5% 42.1% 62.9% 35.8% — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillaume Raoux David Prinosil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1493 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1463 110.5 — — — — +66 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 — -0.21 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25
20 1990 1530 117.3 — — — — +46 — +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.6 +0.60 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64
21 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 — -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) 100.3 -0.55 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54
22 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 — -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 91.6 +1.27 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15
23 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) 95.9 -0.69 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73
24 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 102.8 +0.24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03
25 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 +1.91 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31
26 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) 104.5 -0.30 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22
27 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) 106.2 -0.78 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01
28 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) 104.5 -2.53 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97
29 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 — — 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) 93.4 +0.04 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15
30 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.02 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28 — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.