H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Guillaume Raoux vs David Prinosil H2H: 2-4

David Prinosil holds a 4–2 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while David Prinosil leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam Q2 Q Grass David Prinosil #84 7-6(3) 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #273 Match data
Feb 13, 1999* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet David Prinosil #79 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #73 Match data
Apr 11, 1997* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard David Prinosil #49 3-4 (ret.) Guillaume Raoux #100 Match data
Mar 14, 1997* Copenhagen ATP 250 R16 Carpet Guillaume Raoux #109 7-6(6) 6-4 David Prinosil #45 Match data
Sep 28, 1995* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard David Prinosil #69 3-6 6-3 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #103 Match data
Mar 3, 1994* Copenhagen ATP 250 R32 Carpet Guillaume Raoux #75 7-5 6-2 David Prinosil #113 Match data
Oct 15, 1993* Bolzano ATP 250 R16 Carpet David Prinosil #66 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 Guillaume Raoux #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillaume Raoux David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3