H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0
Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1992 Brisbane semifinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1992* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 6-4 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |