H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-1
Guillaume Raoux and John Van Lottum are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on grass, while Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1998 New Haven third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 6-4 | John Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | John Van Lottum | 7-6(1) 6-3 4-6 7-6(3) | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |