H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs Karsten Braasch H2H: 0-1
Karsten Braasch holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karsten Braasch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karsten Braasch won the 1994 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1994* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karsten Braasch | 6-4 6-4 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Karsten Braasch | #1,445 | #38 | 878 | 1,731 | 68 | 93 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | Karsten Braasch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #56 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #167 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #271 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #261 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #437 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |