H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Guillaume Raoux vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-1

Guillaume Raoux holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1997 Memphis third round 7-5 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1997* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillaume Raoux #93 7-5 5-7 6-4 Mark Woodforde #43 Match data
May 11, 1995* Pinehurst ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillaume Raoux #90 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Mark Woodforde #32 Match data
Jan 5, 1989* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #42 6-4 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #448 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillaume Raoux Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4