H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Guillaume Raoux vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 0-1

Michiel Schapers holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1989 Nancy round of 16 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Michiel Schapers
NED Age 66 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michiel Schapers #82 6-3 7-5 Guillaume Raoux #425 Match data Mar 3, 1989* R16 Nancy ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Michiel Schapers #1,230 #25 606 1,831 154 177 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillaume Raoux Michiel Schapers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1 1983 9–14 39.1% #95 1,580 0 0
24 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1 1984 10–11 47.6% #78 1,645 0 0
25 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1 1985 12–19 38.7% #105 1,645 0 0
26 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1 1986 20–23 46.5% #84 1,633 0 0
27 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1 1987 26–20 56.5% #49 1,695 0 0
28 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1 1988 27–20 57.4% #50 1,744 0 0
29 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1 1989 19–18 51.4% #79 1,663 0 0
30 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1 1990 5–13 27.8% #169 1,560 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1991 6–5 54.5% #85 1,613 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1992 17–26 39.5% #103 1,590 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1993 3–8 27.3% #270 1,527 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillaume Raoux Michiel Schapers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
29 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9% — 70 76 146 47.9% 21 38 59 35.6% 33 26 59 55.9% 30 37 67 44.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillaume Raoux Michiel Schapers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1493 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1463 110.5 — — — — +66 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1530 117.3 — — — — +46 — +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.6 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 — -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) 100.3 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 — -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 91.6 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) 95.9 -0.69 1983 1580 129.8 — — — — +38 -66 — 39.6% -0.91 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 -0.88
24 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 102.8 +0.24 1984 1646 127.3 — — — — +15 -79 — 51.0% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.9 +0.24
25 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 +1.91 1985 1645 123.8 — — — — -73 -92 +10 41.0% -0.63 7–8 (47%) 3–6 (33%) 98.6 +1.43
26 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) 104.5 -0.30 1986 1633 130.3 — — — — +5 -85 +8 50.0% -0.09 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 101.6 +0.67
27 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) 106.2 -0.78 1987 1696 132.9 — — — — -37 -134 +69 55.1% +0.19 8–8 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 102.2 +1.92
28 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) 104.5 -2.53 1988 1744 141.0 — — — — +29 -190 +13 52.6% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–8 (53%) 103.0 +0.01
29 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 — — 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) 93.4 +0.04 1989 1664 124.8 — — — — -15 — +111 50.0% -0.12 4–6 (40%) 12–7 (63%) 99.9 +1.42
30 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.02 1990 1560 121.4 — — — — +60 -34 +149 32.6% -0.76 2–4 (33%) 4–7 (36%) 97.5 -0.19
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1613 110.9 +2.32 -0.83 1.049 50.9% -25 — +138 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1591 128.8 +0.74 -3.05 0.905 48.3% -6 -24 +101 40.4% -0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–10 (33%) 99.3 -0.18
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1527 109.4 -1.77 -2.10 0.883 48.0% +9 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 +0.95
Career — 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28 — 1832 134.9 +0.62 -2.52 0.924 48.7% +1 -90 +67 47.0% -0.24 51–58 (47%) 58–65 (47%) 100.1 +1.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.