H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillaume Raoux vs Neil Borwick H2H: 1-0

Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Neil Borwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1992 Seoul round of 32 6-1 6-1.

FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Age 58 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillaume Raoux #127 6-1 6-1 Neil Borwick #222 Match data Apr 23, 1992* R32 Seoul ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Neil Borwick #1,150 #104 441 1,662 25 50 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillaume Raoux Neil Borwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #506 1,493 0 0
19 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0 1988 1–1 50.0% #597 1,497 0 0
21 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #162 1,486 0 0
22 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1 1990 1–4 20.0% #189 1,482 0 0
23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1 1991 2–8 20.0% #173 1,450 0 0
24 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1 1992 7–5 58.3% #176 1,555 0 0
25 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1 1993 13–15 46.4% #112 1,628 0 0
26 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1 1994 1–14 6.7% #242 1,460 0 0
27 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #400 1,444 0 0
28 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1
30 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillaume Raoux Neil Borwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1994 0 10 10 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9% 19 34 53 35.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's and 61/66 of Neil Borwick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillaume Raoux Neil Borwick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 37/39 5.7 3.5 51.1% 72.6% 48.3% 53.7% 42.7% 60.7% 36.1% —/—
22 1992 28/30 4.3 3.3 52.5% 71.6% 50.9% 61.6% 49.3% 61.8% 37.9% —/—
23 1993 48/55 4.8 2.9 51.0% 74.0% 52.3% 58.5% 44.4% 63.1% 39.3% 1991 10/10 4.8 2.5 60.9% 65.7% 55.9% 55.6% 23.0% 61.6% 33.3%
24 1994 34/35 4.2 3.2 52.9% 72.1% 48.9% 54.2% 36.7% 61.2% 36.4% 1992 12/12 4.9 1.6 67.5% 71.7% 49.5% 52.0% 34.9% 64.1% 33.0%
25 1995 38/39 5.1 2.9 50.3% 72.5% 50.6% 58.8% 45.0% 61.8% 35.5% 1993 24/28 7.2 3.0 64.6% 73.0% 46.7% 60.9% 47.5% 64.0% 37.0%
26 1996 36/43 6.3 2.9 51.8% 75.4% 53.5% 59.8% 46.9% 65.0% 35.4% 1994 14/15 3.9 2.9 64.4% 63.8% 46.3% 55.9% 22.4% 57.7% 29.6%
27 1997 45/52 5.2 2.7 55.6% 74.8% 53.4% 55.0% 38.6% 65.6% 35.4% 1995 1/1 4.0 3.0 70.9% 55.7% 40.0% 44.4% 0.0% 51.2% 27.4%
28 1998 45/51 3.7 2.4 55.7% 70.5% 53.7% 63.3% 39.9% 63.2% 33.6% —/—
29 1999 26/29 4.9 3.7 50.3% 70.5% 53.1% 61.5% 36.8% 61.8% 32.0% —/—
30 2000 2/2 5.5 2.5 51.7% 70.6% 55.9% 75.0% 21.6% 63.6% 35.1% —/—
Career 339/398 4.9 3.0 52.5% 72.8% 51.8% 58.5% 42.1% 62.9% 35.8% 61/75 5.6 2.6 64.6% 69.2% 48.6% 56.9% 34.5% 62.0% 33.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillaume Raoux Neil Borwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1493 101.1 0.0% -3.67 0–1 -0.12 1986 1493 102.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 -0.07
19 1989 1463 110.5 +66 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 -0.21
20 1990 1530 117.3 +46 +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.6 +0.60 1988 1497 100.9 50.0% +1.00 +0.15
21 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) 100.3 -0.55 1989 1487 99.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.01
22 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 91.6 +1.27 1990 1482 107.2 +50 25.0% -1.75 -0.24
23 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) 95.9 -0.69 1991 1451 110.2 -1.64 -1.98 0.867 47.8% +37 30.4% -0.83 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +0.43
24 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 102.8 +0.24 1992 1556 115.3 +0.44 -2.86 0.919 48.6% -9 +53 55.2% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 106.7 +0.81
25 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 +1.91 1993 1629 133.0 +1.41 -0.53 1.029 50.7% +23 -69 44.1% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 99.6 +0.31
26 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) 104.5 -0.30 1994 1460 99.4 -3.82 -4.41 0.701 44.4% +9 17.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.3 +0.74
27 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) 106.2 -0.78 1995 1444 94.4 -3.26 -1.55 0.561 39.4% 0.0% -3.67 +0.09
28 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) 104.5 -2.53
29 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) 93.4 +0.04
30 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 +0.02
Career 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28 1663 119.9 -0.56 -2.13 0.888 48.2% +20 +1 36.5% -0.75 9–14 (39%) 13–14 (48%) 99.0 +2.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.