H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs Neville Godwin H2H: 1-0
Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Neville Godwin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Singapore third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1996* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 6-3 | Neville Godwin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,670 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | Neville Godwin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |