H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs Nicolas Pereira H2H: 2-0
Guillaume Raoux holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Pereira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Queen's Club second round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1996* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Guillaume Raoux | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Nicolas Pereira | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1993* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Guillaume Raoux | 6-4 6-3 | Nicolas Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Pereira | #1,101 | #74 | 658 | 1,689 | 63 | 114 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | Nicolas Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #122 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #110 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |