H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Alex Calatrava H2H: 2-0
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2004 Umag quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2004* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-2 7-6(4) | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| May 31, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 3-6 6-1 6-2 6-0 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Alex Calatrava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |