Guillermo Canas
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Gaston Gaudio | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 6 | 1 | 7 | Mar 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Alberto Martin | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Gustavo Kuerten | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 30, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2002 Libéma Open quarterfinal 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Cedric Pioline | Match data | Jun 22, 2002* | QF | Libéma Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Guillermo Canas | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Cedric Pioline | Match data | Apr 27, 2002* | QF | Barcelona Open | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 1,991 | 245 | 189 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,984 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,870 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,817 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #79 | 1,684 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,626 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2000 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 2001 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 24 | 2002 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 25 | 2003 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 26 | 2004 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1995 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2005 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 29 | 2007 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% |
| 30 | 2008 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 2009 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 97 | 78 | 175 | 55.4% | 117 | 82 | 199 | 58.8% | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | — | 146 | 118 | 264 | 55.3% | 109 | 93 | 202 | 54.0% | 46 | 29 | 75 | 61.3% | 69 | 61 | 130 | 53.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1/3 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 47.6% | 62.5% | 54.5% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 58.3% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 5/5 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 50.9% | 70.7% | 47.1% | 52.2% | 43.1% | 58.5% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 14/20 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 53.2% | 72.2% | 46.0% | 62.4% | 40.8% | 59.7% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 31/38 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 57.2% | 69.1% | 52.5% | 63.4% | 42.8% | 61.6% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 15/17 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 53.3% | 67.7% | 44.7% | 44.1% | 44.4% | 57.1% | 38.5% | 1991 | 40/41 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 59.0% | 68.7% | 51.3% | 60.4% | 46.4% | 61.6% | 38.4% |
| 23 | 2001 | 57/66 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 60.7% | 71.3% | 51.9% | 58.7% | 44.3% | 63.7% | 42.8% | 1992 | 53/58 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 57.0% | 74.5% | 46.4% | 59.3% | 41.4% | 62.6% | 36.9% |
| 24 | 2002 | 58/63 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 59.7% | 73.3% | 54.6% | 56.6% | 43.3% | 65.7% | 41.4% | 1993 | 68/78 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 73.8% | 52.0% | 60.8% | 40.6% | 65.1% | 39.4% |
| 25 | 2003 | 9/9 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 62.9% | 71.5% | 46.3% | 60.8% | 35.2% | 62.1% | 39.9% | 1994 | 44/57 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 70.1% | 48.9% | 53.4% | 42.1% | 61.7% | 39.9% |
| 26 | 2004 | 61/61 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 58.7% | 73.8% | 54.8% | 59.2% | 48.3% | 66.0% | 41.5% | 1995 | 44/51 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 57.9% | 72.7% | 48.2% | 53.6% | 37.8% | 62.4% | 37.6% |
| 27 | 2005 | 32/33 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 60.6% | 70.6% | 53.3% | 63.3% | 47.0% | 64.3% | 43.3% | 1996 | 53/59 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 55.9% | 75.1% | 51.7% | 62.1% | 44.4% | 64.9% | 39.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 51/62 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 60.9% | 73.7% | 51.1% | 61.5% | 42.4% | 64.7% | 38.6% |
| 29 | 2007 | 58/59 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 57.3% | 73.5% | 52.7% | 60.3% | 48.0% | 64.7% | 40.5% | 1998 | 56/64 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 58.6% | 73.5% | 50.4% | 59.3% | 47.1% | 63.8% | 38.3% |
| 30 | 2008 | 39/42 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 53.9% | 71.1% | 50.0% | 54.1% | 44.9% | 61.4% | 38.9% | 1999 | 54/65 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 54.4% | 75.4% | 49.2% | 62.1% | 42.4% | 63.4% | 36.2% |
| 31 | 2009 | 18/18 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 51.2% | 73.2% | 49.3% | 62.8% | 49.0% | 62.0% | 35.9% | 2000 | 46/51 | 8.2 | 4.8 | 52.7% | 78.8% | 51.3% | 60.8% | 41.8% | 65.5% | 39.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 31/39 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 52.5% | 73.2% | 51.4% | 63.6% | 40.7% | 63.1% | 36.9% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 20/26 | 5.7 | 4.4 | 51.2% | 71.3% | 48.3% | 45.7% | 32.5% | 60.3% | 33.6% |
| Career | — | 398/434 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 57.7% | 72.0% | 52.0% | 58.7% | 45.3% | 63.6% | 40.8% | — | 560/671 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 57.1% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 59.3% | 42.2% | 63.5% | 38.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1462 | 97.5 | +1.04 | -2.26 | 0.976 | 49.1% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1461 | 111.0 | +1.67 | -1.40 | 0.916 | 47.7% | +43 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.25 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1481 | 121.3 | -1.19 | -0.67 | 0.917 | 48.3% | +38 | +4 | +126 | 40.4% | -0.50 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.8 | +0.36 | 1989 | 1483 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 12.5% | -1.88 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.41 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1575 | 128.1 | +0.38 | +2.60 | 1.070 | 51.2% | -99 | +35 | +40 | 42.7% | -0.46 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–7 (53%) | 101.0 | -1.21 | 1990 | 1484 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +43 | — | 34.9% | -0.47 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 100.1 | +0.10 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1530 | 126.2 | -2.48 | +0.32 | 0.898 | 47.3% | -56 | +30 | — | 34.1% | -0.98 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 | 1991 | 1665 | 135.0 | +1.05 | -0.51 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -79 | -6 | — | 50.5% | +0.06 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–11 (35%) | 101.5 | -0.32 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1839 | 149.5 | +2.44 | +4.53 | 1.177 | 52.9% | -76 | -16 | -135 | 60.0% | +0.79 | 15–5 (75%) | 9–13 (41%) | 109.3 | +0.72 | 1992 | 1849 | 149.9 | +1.29 | -1.12 | 0.985 | 50.1% | -31 | -113 | -257 | 52.3% | +0.22 | 10–11 (48%) | 10–13 (43%) | 101.4 | -1.91 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1856 | 149.5 | +2.94 | +3.27 | 1.208 | 53.1% | -23 | +31 | -142 | 60.5% | +0.74 | 11–10 (52%) | 13–11 (54%) | 98.1 | +1.54 | 1993 | 1937 | 156.7 | +3.18 | +1.96 | 1.128 | 52.1% | +8 | -173 | -173 | 60.8% | +0.75 | 16–11 (59%) | 19–19 (50%) | 100.8 | -4.16 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1804 | 118.1 | -0.44 | +1.57 | 1.054 | 50.7% | -9 | — | — | 52.2% | +0.09 | 2–0 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.24 | 1994 | 1768 | 141.9 | +0.19 | +1.74 | 1.042 | 50.9% | +34 | -22 | -59 | 51.3% | +0.05 | 12–15 (44%) | 11–8 (58%) | 94.5 | -0.27 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1901 | 152.0 | +3.45 | +3.93 | 1.218 | 53.4% | +11 | +13 | -212 | 61.9% | +0.86 | 10–11 (48%) | 11–9 (55%) | 98.4 | -1.25 | 1995 | 1762 | 147.6 | +1.13 | +0.42 | 1.001 | 49.8% | -23 | +16 | +10 | 50.8% | -0.06 | 4–9 (31%) | 12–7 (63%) | 100.1 | -3.16 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1871 | 147.8 | +2.24 | +5.12 | 1.212 | 53.3% | +67 | +11 | -120 | 64.1% | +1.00 | 2–5 (29%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.1 | +0.92 | 1996 | 1809 | 154.8 | +2.69 | +2.35 | 1.129 | 52.1% | -33 | +87 | +32 | 63.1% | +0.93 | 8–8 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | 101.9 | -1.10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1832 | 150.4 | +2.57 | +1.89 | 1.093 | 51.3% | -28 | +52 | +117 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 14–11 (56%) | 9–10 (47%) | 100.8 | -2.00 |
| 29 | 2007 | 1818 | 155.4 | +2.37 | +3.32 | 1.149 | 52.4% | +52 | +124 | -35 | 64.0% | +0.84 | 5–7 (42%) | 18–6 (75%) | 103.0 | -1.01 | 1998 | 1765 | 148.9 | +1.69 | +0.86 | 1.058 | 51.0% | +5 | +162 | +116 | 56.6% | +0.30 | 12–10 (55%) | 15–14 (52%) | 96.7 | -0.97 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1685 | 140.5 | -1.38 | +1.60 | 1.006 | 50.1% | +67 | +164 | +92 | 48.0% | 0.00 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–12 (29%) | 94.1 | +1.08 | 1999 | 1797 | 143.0 | +1.68 | -0.71 | 0.989 | 50.0% | -26 | -11 | +162 | 55.2% | +0.07 | 9–13 (41%) | 25–10 (71%) | 101.1 | -2.23 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1627 | 123.4 | -1.48 | -0.18 | 0.946 | 49.5% | +28 | +135 | — | 37.5% | -0.44 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–6 (25%) | 89.2 | +0.68 | 2000 | 1764 | 148.1 | +2.89 | +1.87 | 1.144 | 52.4% | -10 | +168 | +138 | 60.6% | +0.75 | 8–9 (47%) | 15–13 (54%) | 99.3 | +0.89 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1658 | 131.9 | +0.83 | -1.42 | 0.999 | 50.1% | +19 | +151 | +176 | 46.7% | -0.27 | 6–8 (43%) | 12–9 (57%) | 96.8 | -0.75 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1620 | 134.1 | -0.60 | -1.51 | 0.847 | 46.8% | +33 | +134 | +147 | 35.1% | -0.91 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–7 (30%) | 94.1 | -2.76 |
| Career | — | 1992 | 149.7 | +1.54 | +2.98 | 1.119 | 51.9% | 0 | +50 | -51 | 54.9% | +0.39 | 60–69 (47%) | 81–78 (51%) | 97.0 | +0.42 | — | 1984 | 152.3 | +1.77 | +0.70 | 1.047 | 50.8% | -10 | +32 | +46 | 54.2% | +0.27 | 114–123 (48%) | 149–132 (53%) | 98.5 | -2.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Gaston Gaudio | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 6 | 1 | 7 | Mar 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Alberto Martin | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Gustavo Kuerten | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 17, 2001 | H2H |
| Todd Martin | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jan 21, 2001 | H2H |
| Andrei Medvedev | 7 | 2 | 9 | Apr 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 3 | 6 | 9 | Nov 16, 2000 | H2H |
| Martin Damm Sr | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |