H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Dennis van Scheppingen H2H: 0-1
Dennis van Scheppingen holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dennis van Scheppingen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dennis van Scheppingen won the 1996 Beijing third round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dennis van Scheppingen | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Dennis van Scheppingen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |