H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2001 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2001* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Guillermo Canas | 6-3 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2001* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-3 6-1 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1999* | Merano | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-1 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |