H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Canas vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1

Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2001 Cincinnati Open round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jan-Michael Gambill
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Canas #60 6-4 6-4 Jan-Michael Gambill #690 Match data Mar 5, 2007 Q1 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jan-Michael Gambill #22 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Canas #33 Match data Aug 11, 2001* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,949 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Canas Jan-Michael Gambill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
19 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0
21 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,754 0 0
22 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,762 0 1
23 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,818 0 1
24 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,759 0 2
25 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,756 0 2
26 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,643 0 3
27 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,558 0 3
29 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,568 0 3
30 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,504 0 3
31 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Canas Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 23 13 36 63.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 20 17 37 54.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 29 13 42 69.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2003 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 20 17 37 54.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 15 18 33 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2% — 160 126 286 55.9% 10 32 42 23.8% 23 21 44 52.3% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's and 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Canas Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5% 2003 43/47 10.1 3.1 56.5% 75.0% 47.9% 60.7% 48.3% 63.4% 36.0%
27 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3% 2004 43/43 11.7 3.1 59.1% 76.0% 47.7% 57.9% 38.7% 64.3% 34.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 15/15 12.3 3.9 56.6% 76.7% 45.9% 58.6% 27.7% 63.3% 32.1%
29 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5% 2006 2/2 11.5 7.0 47.8% 73.2% 44.1% 59.7% 35.0% 57.0% 39.4%
30 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9% 2007 2/2 9.5 5.5 58.7% 79.4% 39.2% 37.5% 20.8% 62.8% 26.7%
31 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 398/434 5.0 2.9 57.7% 72.0% 52.0% 58.7% 45.3% 63.6% 40.8% — 105/392 11.1 3.4 57.5% 75.7% 47.3% 58.8% 40.7% 63.6% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Canas Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.33 1995 1487 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04
19 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36 1997 1520 116.3 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.59
21 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21 1998 1755 144.7 — — — — +27 -222 -139 53.4% +0.32 13–4 (76%) 11–12 (48%) 111.1 +0.72
22 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 — 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.39 1999 1763 145.0 — — — — +37 -263 -154 51.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 10–9 (53%) 102.4 -2.53
23 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72 2000 1819 143.8 — — — — -27 -296 -44 56.3% +0.60 10–10 (50%) 10–17 (37%) 96.8 -1.79
24 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54 2001 1759 150.9 — — — — +67 -256 -39 61.9% +0.81 8–6 (57%) 11–10 (52%) 99.4 +0.99
25 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 — — 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) — +0.24 2002 1756 148.6 — — — — +48 -275 -49 51.9% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 11–14 (44%) 92.3 -0.54
26 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25 2003 1644 133.1 +0.95 -1.36 0.983 50.0% +72 -213 +27 48.2% +0.07 5–6 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 96.5 +1.55
27 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92 2004 1596 125.6 +0.40 -1.44 0.961 49.5% +33 -178 +70 44.1% -0.30 3–7 (30%) 13–11 (54%) 98.0 +1.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1559 116.9 -1.32 -3.12 0.876 47.9% +9 — — 33.3% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.5 +0.61
29 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01 2006 1569 105.0 -1.55 +1.41 0.916 48.6% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02
30 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08 2007 1505 103.5 -0.27 -2.33 0.719 44.4% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.01
31 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 — 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68 2008 1506 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1508 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42 — 1949 145.6 +0.33 -1.61 0.952 49.4% +35 -250 -44 51.3% +0.24 62–56 (53%) 82–87 (49%) 100.1 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.