H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Karol Kucera H2H: 2-2
Guillermo Canas and Karol Kucera are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karol Kucera won the 2003 Chennai quarterfinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2003* | Chennai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Karol Kucera | 6-1 7-5 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2002* | Chennai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Guillermo Canas | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1996* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Karol Kucera | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Karol Kucera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 |