H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Canas vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-0

Guillermo Canas holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 1999 Eastbourne Open round of 32 1-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Canas #72 1-6 7-5 6-3 Mark Woodforde #80 Match data Jun 17, 1999* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Canas Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Canas Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2003 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Canas Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5% 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3% 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5% 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9% 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9% 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Canas Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.22 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 — 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.39 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 — — 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) — +0.24 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 — 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.