H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Canas holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 1999 Nottingham third round 1-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1999* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Guillermo Canas | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |