H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2007 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(4) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Guillermo Canas | 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2007* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-2 7-6(4) | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-3 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |