H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 0-2
Nicolas Escude holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2002 Sydney fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-4 6-1 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Escude | 4-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |