H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Guillermo Canas vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-1

Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2005 Roland Garros fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Guillermo Canas #10 (w/o) Nicolas Kiefer #28 Match data
Oct 25, 2001* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillermo Canas #17 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #42 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #4 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Canas #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Canas Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6