H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Canas vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1

Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1998 US Open round of 64 6-1 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #65 6-1 6-1 7-5 Guillermo Canas #91 Match data Sep 4, 1998* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Canas Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Canas Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 2003 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Canas Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5% 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9% 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9% 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 398/434 5.0 2.9 57.7% 72.0% 52.0% 58.7% 45.3% 63.6% 40.8% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Canas Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 — 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.39 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 — — 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) — +0.24 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 — 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.