H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Canas holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2002 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2002* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-3 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |