H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Alex Calatrava H2H: 3-1
Guillermo Coria holds a 3–1 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 3–0 on clay, while Alex Calatrava leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2001 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2001* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-1 6-1 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-4 6-4 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alex Calatrava | 6-4 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Alex Calatrava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |