Guillermo Coria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6 | 2 | 8 | Apr 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 22, 2006 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jul 31, 2005 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 8, 2005 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Oct 30, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Guillermo Coria and Fabrice Santoro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 1–0 on carpet, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2003 Swiss Indoors round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | 5-7 6-3 6-0 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data | Oct 23, 2003* | R32 | Swiss Indoors | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Fabrice Santoro | 6-2 7-5 | Guillermo Coria | Match data | Mar 22, 2001* | R32 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,124 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,890 | 462 | 435 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,020 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #31 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,701 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,788 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 19 | 2001 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 20 | 2002 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2003 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 38 | 5 | 43 | 88.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1994 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2004 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 22 | 2 | 24 | 91.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2005 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 25 | 6 | 31 | 80.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1996 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 57.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66 | 46 | 112 | 58.9% | 129 | 53 | 182 | 70.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.2% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | 246 | 213 | 459 | 53.6% | 128 | 136 | 264 | 48.5% | 44 | 33 | 77 | 57.1% | 44 | 53 | 97 | 45.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/324 of Guillermo Coria's and 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2000 | 7/7 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 55.3% | 66.5% | 52.2% | 50.8% | 32.5% | 60.3% | 40.0% | 1991 | 43/47 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 59.8% | 64.2% | 47.7% | 57.1% | 45.6% | 57.5% | 43.8% |
| 19 | 2001 | 37/41 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 51.6% | 70.8% | 53.5% | 59.6% | 46.9% | 62.5% | 42.9% | 1992 | 41/51 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 58.7% | 63.0% | 51.9% | 51.4% | 47.1% | 58.2% | 42.1% |
| 20 | 2002 | 27/38 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 64.6% | 68.3% | 52.6% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 62.4% | 43.4% | 1993 | 46/50 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 61.4% | 64.0% | 51.2% | 51.1% | 47.6% | 58.6% | 41.1% |
| 21 | 2003 | 75/78 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 66.6% | 70.9% | 58.0% | 62.2% | 50.2% | 66.6% | 45.6% | 1994 | 36/42 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 61.1% | 66.0% | 51.6% | 64.6% | 42.4% | 60.0% | 42.5% |
| 22 | 2004 | 50/52 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 66.8% | 70.1% | 52.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 64.2% | 42.3% | 1995 | 39/41 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 61.1% | 62.4% | 48.9% | 54.4% | 37.3% | 57.2% | 39.6% |
| 23 | 2005 | 73/73 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 49.2% | 59.7% | 45.9% | 62.3% | 44.4% | 1996 | 13/18 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 53.2% | 61.7% | 49.9% | 50.7% | 47.8% | 56.1% | 36.9% |
| 24 | 2006 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 60.5% | 62.2% | 34.2% | 44.6% | 43.6% | 50.5% | 44.2% | 1997 | 48/55 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 50.9% | 70.6% | 54.1% | 56.5% | 43.0% | 62.5% | 40.7% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 42/54 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 54.4% | 67.3% | 51.7% | 57.4% | 43.3% | 60.1% | 40.6% |
| 26 | 2008 | 10/10 | 0.8 | 10.0 | 62.6% | 58.6% | 38.7% | 47.9% | 57.3% | 51.1% | 43.7% | 1999 | 51/61 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 58.3% | 67.4% | 50.4% | 61.7% | 41.5% | 60.2% | 38.7% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 51/61 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 68.5% | 52.3% | 55.2% | 44.2% | 61.1% | 39.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 51/61 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 57.0% | 66.1% | 51.9% | 62.8% | 47.5% | 60.0% | 39.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 43/52 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 56.0% | 69.4% | 53.4% | 54.4% | 42.1% | 62.2% | 40.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38/38 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 59.9% | 67.0% | 49.7% | 47.3% | 39.7% | 59.9% | 39.2% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 31/33 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 56.0% | 69.3% | 51.0% | 56.2% | 37.7% | 61.0% | 38.8% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 37/37 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 58.5% | 64.7% | 51.6% | 59.6% | 36.9% | 59.4% | 40.2% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 42/42 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 58.4% | 68.0% | 48.9% | 56.2% | 46.1% | 60.0% | 38.2% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 43/43 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 55.7% | 72.3% | 54.2% | 57.1% | 45.6% | 64.1% | 38.6% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 35/35 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 57.5% | 69.5% | 53.5% | 57.8% | 41.1% | 62.7% | 37.2% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 35/35 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 56.6% | 69.3% | 49.5% | 56.5% | 41.4% | 60.9% | 36.1% |
| 37 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 60.2% | 66.2% | 48.8% | 70.6% | 50.0% | 59.3% | 30.4% |
| Career | — | 304/324 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 63.0% | 69.1% | 51.3% | 57.2% | 48.0% | 62.3% | 43.9% | — | 766/897 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 57.4% | 67.1% | 51.3% | 56.5% | 43.2% | 60.3% | 39.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1509 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +18 | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.24 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1685 | 143.3 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -64 | — | 53.2% | -0.15 | 2–7 (22%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -1.45 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1548 | 115.2 | -0.35 | +0.57 | 1.007 | 49.4% | — | +36 | — | 47.4% | -0.42 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | 1991 | 1698 | 140.2 | -2.94 | +4.41 | 1.033 | 50.6% | -23 | +17 | — | 55.5% | +0.39 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -0.38 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1696 | 140.4 | +0.37 | +3.46 | 1.143 | 52.8% | -138 | +89 | — | 57.1% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +1.46 | 1992 | 1748 | 143.8 | -2.09 | +2.77 | 1.007 | 50.2% | -63 | +37 | — | 53.7% | +0.24 | 7–6 (54%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | -1.57 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1761 | 142.1 | +0.49 | +4.90 | 1.156 | 52.2% | -66 | +21 | — | 61.4% | +0.62 | 4–7 (36%) | 11–4 (73%) | — | -0.38 | 1993 | 1632 | 140.6 | -2.07 | +2.75 | 0.993 | 49.9% | +48 | +70 | — | 46.7% | -0.12 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | -0.03 |
| 21 | 2003 | 2020 | 163.9 | +4.25 | +7.30 | 1.366 | 55.6% | -113 | +104 | — | 74.7% | +1.96 | 13–6 (68%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | 0.00 | 1994 | 1737 | 139.2 | -1.00 | +3.08 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -5 | +10 | — | 56.3% | +0.29 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -0.43 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1930 | 154.6 | +1.76 | +5.87 | 1.183 | 53.0% | -79 | +246 | -343 | 66.1% | +1.10 | 13–2 (87%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | -0.41 | 1995 | 1611 | 128.7 | -2.75 | +0.77 | 0.927 | 48.4% | -29 | +106 | — | 43.8% | -0.57 | 6–11 (35%) | 3–8 (27%) | — | +0.74 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1866 | 156.8 | +0.57 | +6.68 | 1.178 | 53.1% | -64 | +268 | -159 | 61.5% | +1.01 | 15–7 (68%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | +0.14 | 1996 | 1558 | 113.5 | -2.78 | -1.32 | 0.840 | 46.7% | -8 | +78 | — | 35.9% | -1.13 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1673 | 120.2 | -7.40 | +4.26 | 0.893 | 47.4% | +68 | +198 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 7–3 (70%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.68 | 1997 | 1804 | 152.5 | +0.69 | +3.16 | 1.085 | 51.3% | -35 | -44 | — | 56.1% | +0.33 | 11–9 (55%) | 11–3 (79%) | — | -2.98 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1709 | 143.8 | -1.02 | +2.20 | 1.017 | 50.4% | -3 | +74 | — | 50.7% | -0.05 | 10–12 (45%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.42 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1576 | 110.7 | -5.84 | +1.96 | 0.893 | 47.5% | — | +109 | — | 39.1% | -0.83 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 1999 | 1766 | 144.6 | -1.34 | +1.00 | 0.973 | 49.6% | +38 | -13 | -220 | 56.4% | +0.23 | 10–5 (67%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | +1.38 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1740 | 141.2 | -0.34 | +2.05 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +13 | +19 | -204 | 51.0% | -0.11 | 13–8 (62%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.61 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1769 | 141.9 | -1.14 | +1.52 | 0.980 | 49.9% | -19 | +17 | -124 | 56.3% | +0.07 | 9–7 (56%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.40 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1740 | 141.0 | -0.22 | +2.22 | 1.064 | 51.1% | +48 | -51 | -125 | 51.5% | +0.12 | 10–12 (45%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | +1.01 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1709 | 127.8 | -1.70 | +2.05 | 0.978 | 49.4% | +20 | -96 | -93 | 45.7% | -0.26 | 9–10 (47%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | -0.35 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1816 | 137.3 | -1.06 | +1.68 | 0.997 | 49.9% | -21 | -159 | — | 50.0% | +0.07 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.43 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1781 | 146.7 | -1.92 | +3.04 | 0.990 | 49.9% | +42 | -184 | -142 | 50.0% | +0.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -2.81 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1702 | 141.3 | -1.28 | +1.44 | 0.957 | 49.5% | +11 | -128 | +3 | 48.2% | -0.10 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -2.48 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1788 | 144.1 | +1.04 | +2.02 | 1.074 | 51.2% | -11 | — | +11 | 55.1% | +0.11 | 6–9 (40%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | -1.41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1758 | 141.9 | -0.13 | +0.94 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +37 | -208 | +68 | 49.4% | -0.26 | 3–2 (60%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -0.59 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1696 | 134.7 | -1.83 | -0.14 | 0.922 | 48.5% | -3 | -186 | +180 | 42.9% | -0.27 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -1.38 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1690 | 110.3 | +0.81 | +1.44 | 0.747 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.33 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| Career | — | 2124 | 155.1 | +0.75 | +5.65 | 1.167 | 52.9% | -77 | +149 | -264 | 62.7% | +0.98 | 64–35 (65%) | 52–40 (57%) | 107.8 | +0.56 | — | 1890 | 147.6 | -1.17 | +2.02 | 1.000 | 50.0% | +6 | +5 | -36 | 51.0% | -0.01 | 147–150 (49%) | 155–133 (54%) | 103.9 | -1.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6 | 2 | 8 | Apr 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 22, 2006 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jul 31, 2005 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 8, 2005 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Oct 30, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | 7 | 7 | 14 | Oct 10, 2003 | H2H |
| Sebastien Grosjean | 8 | 3 | 11 | Oct 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jun 24, 2009 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jan 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 20, 2009 | H2H |