H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Coria holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Coria leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2003 Australian Open second round 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Guillermo Coria | 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |