H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-1
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Coria in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 7-5 6-2 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |