H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Coria holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Coria leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2001 Rome Masters second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2001* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 7-5 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |