H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Coria holds a 2–1 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2006 Bastad third round 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2003* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-2 6-2 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2003* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |