Guillermo Coria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6 | 2 | 8 | Apr 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 22, 2006 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jul 31, 2005 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 8, 2005 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Oct 30, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Guillermo Coria holds a 2–1 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2006 Swedish Open round of 32 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Guillermo Coria | Match data | Jul 13, 2006* | R32 | Swedish Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Guillermo Coria | 6-2 6-2 | Jose Acasuso | Match data | Apr 16, 2003* | R64 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Guillermo Coria | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jose Acasuso | Match data | Feb 20, 2003* | R32 | Argentina Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,124 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,020 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2002 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 38 | 5 | 43 | 88.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 2004 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 22 | 2 | 24 | 91.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2005 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 25 | 6 | 31 | 80.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2006 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2006 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66 | 46 | 112 | 58.9% | 129 | 53 | 182 | 70.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.2% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | 42 | 67 | 109 | 38.5% | 135 | 98 | 233 | 57.9% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/324 of Guillermo Coria's and 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2000 | 7/7 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 55.3% | 66.5% | 52.2% | 50.8% | 32.5% | 60.3% | 40.0% | 2001 | 18/20 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 47.2% | 71.2% | 48.0% | 59.4% | 40.6% | 58.6% | 34.2% |
| 19 | 2001 | 37/41 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 51.6% | 70.8% | 53.5% | 59.6% | 46.9% | 62.5% | 42.9% | 2002 | 36/38 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 54.9% | 71.4% | 51.6% | 57.5% | 46.7% | 62.1% | 37.5% |
| 20 | 2002 | 27/38 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 64.6% | 68.3% | 52.6% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 62.4% | 43.4% | 2003 | 29/30 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 56.4% | 68.6% | 50.8% | 55.4% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 34.0% |
| 21 | 2003 | 75/78 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 66.6% | 70.9% | 58.0% | 62.2% | 50.2% | 66.6% | 45.6% | 2004 | 34/34 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 53.8% | 72.2% | 50.2% | 46.7% | 37.0% | 62.1% | 38.3% |
| 22 | 2004 | 50/52 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 66.8% | 70.1% | 52.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 64.2% | 42.3% | 2005 | 52/53 | 7.6 | 2.6 | 54.1% | 75.1% | 53.0% | 61.8% | 40.6% | 64.9% | 36.3% |
| 23 | 2005 | 73/73 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 49.2% | 59.7% | 45.9% | 62.3% | 44.4% | 2006 | 48/48 | 6.8 | 2.0 | 53.0% | 74.9% | 54.9% | 60.2% | 46.5% | 65.5% | 38.8% |
| 24 | 2006 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 60.5% | 62.2% | 34.2% | 44.6% | 43.6% | 50.5% | 44.2% | 2007 | 37/37 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 54.8% | 71.9% | 49.8% | 51.2% | 42.5% | 62.3% | 38.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 50/50 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 54.9% | 72.1% | 47.9% | 57.8% | 36.6% | 61.0% | 38.0% |
| 26 | 2008 | 10/10 | 0.8 | 10.0 | 62.6% | 58.6% | 38.7% | 47.9% | 57.3% | 51.1% | 43.7% | 2009 | 42/42 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 55.4% | 72.8% | 50.5% | 61.1% | 39.9% | 62.8% | 34.6% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 60.8% | 73.5% | 55.2% | 52.3% | 47.9% | 65.9% | 38.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 55.7% | 70.0% | 59.0% | 75.9% | 43.9% | 64.7% | 37.4% |
| Career | — | 304/324 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 63.0% | 69.1% | 51.3% | 57.2% | 48.0% | 62.3% | 43.9% | — | 353/359 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 54.3% | 72.6% | 51.1% | 57.3% | 41.3% | 62.7% | 37.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1518 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 1548 | 115.2 | -0.35 | +0.57 | 1.007 | 49.4% | — | +36 | — | 47.4% | -0.42 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | 2001 | 1537 | 125.9 | -1.22 | -2.64 | 0.825 | 46.8% | -26 | +67 | — | 42.0% | -0.64 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.0 | -0.39 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1696 | 140.4 | +0.37 | +3.46 | 1.143 | 52.8% | -138 | +89 | — | 57.1% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 5–7 (42%) | 103.7 | +1.46 | 2002 | 1667 | 134.9 | -0.20 | -0.36 | 0.990 | 49.8% | -189 | +134 | — | 52.8% | +0.12 | 3–4 (43%) | 7–3 (70%) | 103.5 | +1.97 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1761 | 142.1 | +0.49 | +4.90 | 1.156 | 52.2% | -66 | +21 | — | 61.4% | +0.62 | 4–7 (36%) | 11–4 (73%) | 102.9 | -0.38 | 2003 | 1614 | 125.8 | -0.09 | -3.06 | 0.865 | 47.6% | -127 | +114 | — | 38.0% | -0.53 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.5 | -0.45 |
| 21 | 2003 | 2020 | 163.9 | +4.25 | +7.30 | 1.366 | 55.6% | -113 | +104 | — | 74.7% | +1.96 | 13–6 (68%) | 9–7 (56%) | 106.3 | 0.00 | 2004 | 1686 | 136.4 | +0.65 | -0.32 | 1.010 | 50.2% | -228 | +141 | — | 52.6% | -0.08 | 4–4 (50%) | 9–3 (75%) | 103.8 | -0.74 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1930 | 154.6 | +1.76 | +5.87 | 1.183 | 53.0% | -79 | +246 | -343 | 66.1% | +1.10 | 13–2 (87%) | 11–5 (69%) | 110.9 | -0.41 | 2005 | 1725 | 137.2 | +2.49 | -0.53 | 1.034 | 50.4% | -82 | +16 | — | 48.8% | -0.07 | 7–8 (47%) | 12–10 (55%) | 102.3 | +0.52 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1866 | 156.8 | +0.57 | +6.68 | 1.178 | 53.1% | -64 | +268 | -159 | 61.5% | +1.01 | 15–7 (68%) | 11–12 (48%) | 101.6 | +0.14 | 2006 | 1711 | 145.1 | +2.75 | +0.79 | 1.124 | 52.1% | -91 | +141 | — | 56.3% | +0.60 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–12 (40%) | 98.7 | +2.36 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1673 | 120.2 | -7.40 | +4.26 | 0.893 | 47.4% | +68 | +198 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 7–3 (70%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.5 | +0.68 | 2007 | 1686 | 138.1 | -0.78 | +1.04 | 1.023 | 50.3% | -59 | +104 | — | 52.5% | +0.01 | 1–4 (20%) | 7–5 (58%) | 98.6 | +0.97 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1697 | 140.0 | -1.63 | +0.93 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -55 | +78 | — | 50.9% | +0.17 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–11 (31%) | 98.5 | +1.79 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1576 | 110.7 | -5.84 | +1.96 | 0.893 | 47.5% | — | +109 | — | 39.1% | -0.83 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 2009 | 1733 | 148.1 | 0.00 | -1.51 | 0.931 | 48.9% | -59 | +71 | — | 53.8% | +0.22 | 5–3 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.0 | -0.56 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1668 | 108.9 | -1.74 | -1.64 | 1.122 | 51.9% | — | — | — | 37.5% | 0.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.71 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1657 | 116.1 | +0.80 | +1.94 | 1.062 | 50.7% | — | +93 | — | 57.1% | +1.00 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.36 |
| Career | — | 2124 | 155.1 | +0.75 | +5.65 | 1.167 | 52.9% | -77 | +149 | -264 | 62.7% | +0.98 | 64–35 (65%) | 52–40 (57%) | 107.8 | +0.56 | — | 1830 | 143.9 | +0.39 | -0.37 | 0.991 | 49.8% | -86 | +97 | — | 50.5% | +0.05 | 47–45 (51%) | 59–66 (47%) | 101.2 | +1.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6 | 2 | 8 | Apr 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 22, 2006 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jul 31, 2005 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 8, 2005 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Oct 30, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | 2 | 9 | 11 | Apr 23, 2009 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 26, 2009 | H2H |
| Nicolas Almagro | 2 | 7 | 9 | Feb 19, 2011 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 5 | 3 | 8 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Gaston Gaudio | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 20, 2006 | H2H |