H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Guillermo Coria vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 6-1

Guillermo Coria holds a 6–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2006 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Coria
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 22, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Guillermo Coria #9 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #13 Match data
May 5, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Guillermo Coria #11 6-1 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #30 Match data
Apr 22, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Guillermo Coria #4 6-0 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #32 Match data
Mar 28, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Guillermo Coria #4 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #44 Match data
Jan 15, 2004* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillermo Coria #5 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #57 Match data
May 30, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Guillermo Coria #7 6-3 5-7 6-3 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #77 Match data
Aug 17, 2000* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #15 4-6 6-3 6-2 Guillermo Coria #182 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Coria #1,121 #3 3,770 2,114 211 113 65.1% 0 2 0 0 7 9
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Coria Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #88 1,547 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2001 26–15 63.4% #44 1,698 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 22–16 57.9% #45 1,762 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 61–17 78.2% #5 2,009 0 6 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 37–15 71.2% #7 1,923 0 8 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 49–24 67.1% #8 1,865 0 9 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 11–14 44.0% #116 1,671 0 9 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 — — — — — — — 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 2–8 20.0% #577 1,575 0 9 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6