H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Coria vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 6-1

Guillermo Coria holds a 6–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2006 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 16 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Coria
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Coria #9 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #13 Match data Apr 22, 2006* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Guillermo Coria #11 6-1 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #30 Match data May 5, 2005* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Guillermo Coria #4 6-0 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #32 Match data Apr 22, 2004* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Guillermo Coria #4 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #44 Match data Mar 28, 2004* QF Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Guillermo Coria #5 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #57 Match data Jan 15, 2004* R32 ASB Classic International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Coria #7 6-3 5-7 6-3 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #77 Match data May 30, 2003* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nicolas Kiefer #15 4-6 6-3 6-2 Guillermo Coria #182 Match data Aug 17, 2000* R32 Washington Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Coria #1,121 #3 3,770 2,124 211 113 65.1% 0 2 0 2 5 9
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Coria Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #88 1,547 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 2001 26–15 63.4% #44 1,696 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 2002 22–16 57.9% #45 1,760 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 2003 61–17 78.2% #5 2,020 0 6 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 2004 37–15 71.2% #7 1,929 0 8 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 2005 49–24 67.1% #8 1,865 0 9 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 2006 11–14 44.0% #116 1,672 0 9 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 — — — — — — — 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 2–8 20.0% #577 1,575 0 9 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Coria Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2003 17 10 27 63.0% 38 5 43 88.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2004 10 10 20 50.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 19 11 30 63.3% 25 6 31 80.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — — 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2008 — — — — 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 66 46 112 58.9% 129 53 182 70.9% 9 7 16 56.2% 7 7 14 50.0% — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/324 of Guillermo Coria's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Coria Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 2000 7/7 3.4 2.9 55.3% 66.5% 52.2% 50.8% 32.5% 60.3% 40.0% 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 2001 37/41 3.6 2.6 51.6% 70.8% 53.5% 59.6% 46.9% 62.5% 42.9% 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 2002 27/38 3.7 1.8 64.6% 68.3% 52.6% 53.7% 47.4% 62.4% 43.4% 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 2003 75/78 2.8 1.7 66.6% 70.9% 58.0% 62.2% 50.2% 66.6% 45.6% 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 2004 50/52 2.5 2.7 66.8% 70.1% 52.6% 55.2% 51.2% 64.2% 42.3% 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 2005 73/73 3.5 4.6 63.3% 70.0% 49.2% 59.7% 45.9% 62.3% 44.4% 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 2006 25/25 0.6 11.5 60.5% 62.2% 34.2% 44.6% 43.6% 50.5% 44.2% 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 2008 10/10 0.8 10.0 62.6% 58.6% 38.7% 47.9% 57.3% 51.1% 43.7% 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%
Career — 304/324 2.9 3.8 63.0% 69.1% 51.3% 57.2% 48.0% 62.3% 43.9% — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Coria Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08
18 2000 1548 115.2 -0.35 +0.57 1.007 49.4% — +36 — 47.4% -0.42 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
19 2001 1696 140.4 +0.37 +3.46 1.143 52.8% -138 +89 — 57.1% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 5–7 (42%) 103.7 +1.46 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64
20 2002 1761 142.1 +0.49 +4.90 1.156 52.2% -66 +21 — 61.4% +0.62 4–7 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 102.9 -0.38 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30
21 2003 2020 163.9 +4.25 +7.30 1.366 55.6% -113 +104 — 74.7% +1.96 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 106.3 0.00 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49
22 2004 1930 154.6 +1.76 +5.87 1.183 53.0% -79 +246 -343 66.1% +1.10 13–2 (87%) 11–5 (69%) 110.9 -0.41 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03
23 2005 1866 156.8 +0.57 +6.68 1.178 53.1% -64 +268 -159 61.5% +1.01 15–7 (68%) 11–12 (48%) 101.6 +0.14 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55
24 2006 1673 120.2 -7.40 +4.26 0.893 47.4% +68 +198 — 47.5% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 4–2 (67%) 99.5 +0.68 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36
26 2008 1576 110.7 -5.84 +1.96 0.893 47.5% — +109 — 39.1% -0.83 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.21 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60
Career — 2124 155.1 +0.75 +5.65 1.167 52.9% -77 +149 -264 62.7% +0.98 64–35 (65%) 52–40 (57%) 107.8 +0.56 — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.