H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Coria holds a 2–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Coria leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Guillermo Coria | 6-3 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2003* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 7-5 6-2 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-2 7-5 6-0 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |