Guillermo Coria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6 | 2 | 8 | Apr 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 22, 2006 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jul 31, 2005 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 8, 2005 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Oct 30, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Sebastien De Chaunac H2H: 0-1
Sebastien De Chaunac holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Coria in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien De Chaunac leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien De Chaunac won the 2005 Marseille round of 32 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien De Chaunac | 6-4 7-5 | Guillermo Coria | Match data | Feb 10, 2005* | R32 | Marseille | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,124 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Sebastien De Chaunac | #952 | #130 | 428 | 1,657 | 11 | 22 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,020 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #601 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 38 | 5 | 43 | 88.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 22 | 2 | 24 | 91.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 25 | 6 | 31 | 80.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66 | 46 | 112 | 58.9% | 129 | 53 | 182 | 70.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.2% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/324 of Guillermo Coria's and 28/29 of Sebastien De Chaunac's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2000 | 7/7 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 55.3% | 66.5% | 52.2% | 50.8% | 32.5% | 60.3% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 37/41 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 51.6% | 70.8% | 53.5% | 59.6% | 46.9% | 62.5% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 27/38 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 64.6% | 68.3% | 52.6% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 62.4% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 75/78 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 66.6% | 70.9% | 58.0% | 62.2% | 50.2% | 66.6% | 45.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 50/52 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 66.8% | 70.1% | 52.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 64.2% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 73/73 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 49.2% | 59.7% | 45.9% | 62.3% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 60.5% | 62.2% | 34.2% | 44.6% | 43.6% | 50.5% | 44.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 10/10 | 0.8 | 10.0 | 62.6% | 58.6% | 38.7% | 47.9% | 57.3% | 51.1% | 43.7% | 2004 | 8/8 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 56.2% | 66.9% | 47.9% | 46.2% | 33.3% | 58.5% | 31.5% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6/7 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 55.3% | 69.7% | 49.7% | 62.5% | 42.6% | 60.9% | 35.4% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 59.7% | 65.0% | 51.9% | 70.0% | 0.0% | 59.7% | 25.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 60.7% | 74.3% | 47.9% | 63.6% | 30.0% | 63.9% | 32.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 56.3% | 65.9% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 66.7% | 58.1% | 26.9% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10/10 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 51.0% | 74.7% | 48.0% | 59.3% | 32.2% | 61.5% | 33.8% |
| Career | — | 304/324 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 63.0% | 69.1% | 51.3% | 57.2% | 48.0% | 62.3% | 43.9% | — | 28/33 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 54.5% | 70.4% | 48.5% | 54.5% | 36.0% | 60.3% | 32.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1548 | 115.2 | -0.35 | +0.57 | 1.007 | 49.4% | — | +36 | — | 47.4% | -0.42 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 1696 | 140.4 | +0.37 | +3.46 | 1.143 | 52.8% | -138 | +89 | — | 57.1% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 5–7 (42%) | 103.7 | +1.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 1761 | 142.1 | +0.49 | +4.90 | 1.156 | 52.2% | -66 | +21 | — | 61.4% | +0.62 | 4–7 (36%) | 11–4 (73%) | 102.9 | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 2020 | 163.9 | +4.25 | +7.30 | 1.366 | 55.6% | -113 | +104 | — | 74.7% | +1.96 | 13–6 (68%) | 9–7 (56%) | 106.3 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 1930 | 154.6 | +1.76 | +5.87 | 1.183 | 53.0% | -79 | +246 | -343 | 66.1% | +1.10 | 13–2 (87%) | 11–5 (69%) | 110.9 | -0.41 | 2000 | 1501 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1866 | 156.8 | +0.57 | +6.68 | 1.178 | 53.1% | -64 | +268 | -159 | 61.5% | +1.01 | 15–7 (68%) | 11–12 (48%) | 101.6 | +0.14 | 2001 | 1529 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1673 | 120.2 | -7.40 | +4.26 | 0.893 | 47.4% | +68 | +198 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 7–3 (70%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.5 | +0.68 | 2002 | 1522 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1494 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 1576 | 110.7 | -5.84 | +1.96 | 0.893 | 47.5% | — | +109 | — | 39.1% | -0.83 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 2004 | 1525 | 112.4 | -2.44 | -1.09 | 0.759 | 45.9% | +87 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.26 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.13 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1493 | 107.9 | -1.10 | -0.18 | 0.905 | 48.4% | +56 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.64 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1472 | 99.4 | +1.35 | -1.93 | 0.620 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1507 | 103.5 | +3.84 | +0.85 | 0.893 | 48.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1514 | 114.1 | -0.58 | -2.29 | 0.641 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1614 | 118.1 | -2.48 | -0.79 | 0.878 | 48.2% | +39 | — | — | 46.4% | -0.64 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.6 | +0.41 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1544 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2124 | 155.1 | +0.75 | +5.65 | 1.167 | 52.9% | -77 | +149 | -264 | 62.7% | +0.98 | 64–35 (65%) | 52–40 (57%) | 107.8 | +0.56 | — | 1657 | 114.1 | -1.67 | -0.83 | 0.821 | 47.1% | +58 | +7 | — | 34.1% | -1.09 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.9 | -1.47 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sebastien De Chaunac
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 2009 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2009 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 7, 2009 | H2H |
| Dmitry Tursunov | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Denis Istomin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 4, 2009 | H2H |