H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 2-4

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 4–2 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay, while Dmitry Tursunov leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2009 Eastbourne semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2009* Eastbourne ATP 250 SF Grass Dmitry Tursunov #27 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #50 Match data
May 29, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Dmitry Tursunov #33 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #96 Match data
Jun 23, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Dmitry Tursunov #24 4-6 6-3 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data
May 3, 2007* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #62 6-4 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #24 Match data
Sep 15, 2006* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #82 6-2 3-6 7-6(3) Dmitry Tursunov #22 Match data
Oct 5, 2005* Tokyo ATP 250 R64 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #129 3-6 6-4 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,914 223 215 50.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,681 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,738 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,785 0 1
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2008 35–21 62.5% #22 1,861 0 5
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,705 0 6
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,767 0 7
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2012 3–9 25.0% #122 1,698 0 7
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,746 0 7
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,676 0 7
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,622 0 7
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5 — — — — — — —