H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 2-4

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 4–2 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay, while Dmitry Tursunov leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2009 Eastbourne Open semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dmitry Tursunov #27 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #50 Match data Jun 20, 2009* SF Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Dmitry Tursunov #33 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #96 Match data May 29, 2008* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Dmitry Tursunov #24 4-6 6-3 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data Jun 23, 2007* QF Eastbourne Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #62 6-4 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #24 Match data May 3, 2007* R16 Estoril Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #82 6-2 3-6 7-6(3) Dmitry Tursunov #22 Match data Sep 15, 2006* R16 Tiriac Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Dmitry Tursunov #129 3-6 6-4 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #87 Match data Oct 5, 2005* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 429/440 7.4 3.9 57.4% 73.1% 50.5% 60.1% 42.4% 63.3% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 — +0.16
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 — — 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 -1.08
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 — -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -1.22
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) 102.4 +1.38
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) 104.7 +2.65
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) 107.5 -0.15
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 — +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 +1.41
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 — — 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.47
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 — +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 105.2 -0.69
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 — +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 — 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) 112.1 +0.52
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 98.4 +0.04
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 2015 1753 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 — — 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 -0.60
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.