H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 1-2

Evgeny Korolev holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evgeny Korolev leads 1–0 on clay, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2009 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2009* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #50 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2 Evgeny Korolev #101 Match data
Apr 27, 2009 Rome Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Clay Evgeny Korolev #91 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #70 Match data
Feb 28, 2009* Delray Beach ATP 250 QF Hard Evgeny Korolev #105 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #83 Match data
Apr 12, 2007* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Clay Evgeny Korolev #66 6-3 1-6 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Evgeny Korolev #1,762 #46 1,012 1,791 72 91 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Evgeny Korolev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 8–8 50.0% #103 1,612 0 0
19 2007 20–24 45.5% #80 1,680 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2008 13–17 43.3% #106 1,677 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2009 17–17 50.0% #53 1,728 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2010 12–20 37.5% #140 1,665 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2012 1–3 25.0% #211 1,624 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2013 1–2 33.3% #329 1,596 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5