H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 0-2

Jose Acasuso holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2007 Hamburg Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Acasuso #32 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #59 Match data May 16, 2007* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Jose Acasuso #57 6-4 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #91 Match data Feb 11, 2005* R16 Argentina Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Jose Acasuso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Jose Acasuso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Jose Acasuso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.