H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-3

Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 3–2 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2010 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-2.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #42 6-2 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #55 Match data
May 10, 2009 Madrid Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #190 6-1 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #72 Match data
Apr 30, 2008* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #37 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #79 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #86 6-4 6-2 1-6 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #20 Match data
Oct 10, 2007* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #16 6-1 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #93 Match data
Jan 13, 2005* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #26 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #108 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5