H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-3

Lukas Rosol holds a 3–2 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Auckland third round 7-6(5) 6-4.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam Q2 Q Grass Lukas Rosol #129 7-5 3-6 8-6 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #164 Match data
Jan 14, 2016* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Lukas Rosol #54 7-6(5) 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #27 Match data
Nov 4, 2015* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lukas Rosol #66 6-2 2-6 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #26 Match data
Oct 2, 2015* Shenzhen ATP 250 R16 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #29 6-4 6-3 Lukas Rosol #80 Match data
Apr 25, 2015* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #45 6-4 7-6(7) Lukas Rosol #33 Match data
Apr 28, 2013* Bucharest ATP 250 F Clay Lukas Rosol #48 6-3 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2