H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez and Lukasz Kubot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2011 Stuttgart fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-3 6-2 7-6(4) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |