H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 5-0

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 5–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2018 Winston-Salem second round 7-6(2) 6-4.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 31, 2018 Doha ATP 250 Q2 Q Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #105 4-6 6-2 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #124 Match data
Aug 21, 2018* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R64 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #69 7-6(2) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #92 Match data
Apr 24, 2015* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #45 7-5 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #59 Match data
Feb 7, 2015* Zagreb ATP 250 SF Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #33 6-4 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #67 Match data
May 8, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #94 6-4 3-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #41 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 7-5 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5