H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 5-0

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 5–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2018 Winston-Salem Open first round 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #105 4-6 6-2 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #124 Match data Dec 31, 2018 Q2 Q Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #69 7-6(2) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #92 Match data Aug 21, 2018* R64 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #45 7-5 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #59 Match data Apr 24, 2015* R16 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #33 6-4 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #67 Match data Feb 7, 2015* SF Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #94 6-4 3-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #41 Match data May 8, 2012* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 7-5 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data Mar 8, 2007* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) 101.2 -0.74
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) 105.9 -1.44
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) 107.4 -0.34
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) 97.2 -0.74
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) 91.3 -0.90
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) 103.7 -0.06
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 97.1 -0.79
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) 101.4 -1.33
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 86.4 -2.69
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.23
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) 105.0 -0.74
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 100.2 -2.18
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) 104.3 -0.55
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 +0.39
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.