H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on carpet, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2008 Gstaad fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | (w/o) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2005* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |