H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-2
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2013 Sydney third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2013* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-3 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2011* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-1 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2009* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |