H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 3-1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 3–1 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2016 Geneva fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-4 7-6(4) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-4 7-6(7) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2010* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(1) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |