H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay, while Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2013 Bucharest fourth round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2013* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2011* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |