H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 2-2

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez and Somdev Devvarman are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
IND Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #53 6-4 6-3 Somdev Devvarman #84 Match data
Jun 15, 2011* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Somdev Devvarman #68 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #32 Match data
Apr 29, 2011* Belgrade ATP 250 R16 Clay Somdev Devvarman #71 7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(8) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #26 Match data
Apr 8, 2011* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #27 6-4 6-1 Somdev Devvarman #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Somdev Devvarman #1,347 #62 771 1,799 49 70 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Somdev Devvarman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #1116 1,486 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #1033 1,494 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2008 2–2 50.0% #204 1,603 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #126 1,672 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2010 7–11 38.9% #108 1,652 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2011 19–22 46.3% #84 1,676 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2012 0–2 0.0% #664 1,619 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2013 11–12 47.8% #90 1,741 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2014 3–10 23.1% #138 1,549 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2015 0–2 0.0% #177 1,517 0 0
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2016 0–1 0.0% #909 1,493 0 0
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5