H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 2–1 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2010 Doha third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2010* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 6-4 6-1 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2009* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-3 6-3 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2008* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-4 (ret.) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |