H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs C. Steeb H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 2–1 lead over C. Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, C. Steeb won the 1993 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1993* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | C. Steeb | 6-4 7-6(8) | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1991* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-4 6-0 | C. Steeb | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1986* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-3 6-1 | C. Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| C. Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | C. Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |