H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-1
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 2–1 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1992 Buzios third round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Buzios | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cassio Motta | 3-0 (ret.) | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 7-6 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1987* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |