H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-0

Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1990 Florence round of 32 4-6 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Perez-Roldan
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #20 4-6 7-5 7-6 Cedric Pioline #157 Match data Jun 14, 1990* R32 Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #1,461 #13 1,222 1,932 236 129 64.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 9–7 56.2% #109 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 40–15 72.7% #19 1,809 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1988 43–19 69.4% #18 1,836 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1989 33–16 67.3% #32 1,808 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1990 41–21 66.1% #14 1,789 0 6 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1991 26–16 61.9% #40 1,767 0 7 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 24–18 57.1% #50 1,646 0 8 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 19–11 63.3% #82 1,754 0 9 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1996 1–6 14.3% #420 1,650 0 9 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 40 14 54 74.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 41 14 55 74.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 31 12 43 72.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 — — — — 41 19 60 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1991 3 3 6 50.0% 23 13 36 63.9% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1993 — — — — 19 11 30 63.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1996 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 7 14 21 33.3% 229 112 341 67.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1590 122.7 — — — — — +35 — 55.0% +0.40 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1810 140.7 — — — — — +62 — 64.3% +0.99 13–4 (76%) 8–7 (53%) 106.8 +3.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1837 152.0 — — — — -321 +113 — 65.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 12–5 (71%) 102.3 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1809 142.5 — — — — -303 +105 — 61.3% +0.93 10–4 (71%) 8–5 (62%) 103.0 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1790 146.4 — — — — — +115 — 61.7% +0.72 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) 105.9 +0.84 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1991 1768 144.4 — — — — -256 +86 — 63.0% +1.03 7–6 (54%) 8–5 (62%) 100.4 +0.53 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1992 1647 130.7 — — — — — +96 — 57.1% +0.64 8–5 (62%) 8–6 (57%) 101.3 +3.10 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1993 1755 138.4 — — — — — +70 — 59.4% +0.25 7–2 (78%) 11–2 (85%) 112.7 -0.09 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1996 1650 104.7 — — — — — +48 — 13.3% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.23 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1933 147.3 — — — — -295 +91 — 61.1% +0.77 71–37 (66%) 69–41 (63%) 111.4 +2.65 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.