H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1988 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 5-7 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1988* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |