H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1987 Florence fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1987* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |