H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1990 Athens round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Perez-Roldan
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #14 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #134 Match data Oct 5, 1990* R16 Athens ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #14 6-1 6-2 Jeff Tarango #136 Match data Sep 27, 1990* R32 Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #1,461 #13 1,222 1,932 236 129 64.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 9–7 56.2% #109 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 40–15 72.7% #19 1,809 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1988 43–19 69.4% #18 1,836 0 4 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1989 33–16 67.3% #32 1,808 0 5 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1990 41–21 66.1% #14 1,789 0 6 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1991 26–16 61.9% #40 1,767 0 7 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1992 24–18 57.1% #50 1,646 0 8 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1993 19–11 63.3% #82 1,754 0 9 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1996 1–6 14.3% #420 1,650 0 9 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 40 14 54 74.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 41 14 55 74.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 31 12 43 72.1% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 — — — — 41 19 60 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 3 3 6 50.0% 23 13 36 63.9% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 — — — — 19 11 30 63.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1996 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 14 21 33.3% 229 112 341 67.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1590 122.7 — — — — — +35 — 55.0% +0.40 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1810 140.7 — — — — — +62 — 64.3% +0.99 13–4 (76%) 8–7 (53%) — +3.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1837 152.0 — — — — -321 +113 — 65.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 12–5 (71%) — 0.00 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1989 1809 142.5 — — — — -303 +105 — 61.3% +0.93 10–4 (71%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.62 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1990 1790 146.4 — — — — — +115 — 61.7% +0.72 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.84 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1991 1768 144.4 — — — — -256 +86 — 63.0% +1.03 7–6 (54%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.53 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1992 1647 130.7 — — — — — +96 — 57.1% +0.64 8–5 (62%) 8–6 (57%) — +3.10 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1993 1755 138.4 — — — — — +70 — 59.4% +0.25 7–2 (78%) 11–2 (85%) — -0.09 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1996 1650 104.7 — — — — — +48 — 13.3% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.23 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 147.3 — — — — -295 +91 — 61.1% +0.77 71–37 (66%) 69–41 (63%) 111.4 +2.65 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.