H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Perez-Roldan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1988 Miami Open round of 128 4-6 6-3 2-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Perez-Roldan
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #56 4-6 6-3 2-6 7-5 6-2 Guillermo Perez-Roldan #25 Match data Mar 15, 1988* R128 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Perez-Roldan #1,461 #13 1,222 1,932 236 129 64.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 9–7 56.2% #109 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 40–15 72.7% #19 1,809 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1988 43–19 69.4% #18 1,836 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1989 33–16 67.3% #32 1,808 0 5 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1990 41–21 66.1% #14 1,789 0 6 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1991 26–16 61.9% #40 1,767 0 7 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1992 24–18 57.1% #50 1,646 0 8 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 1993 19–11 63.3% #82 1,754 0 9 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 1996 1–6 14.3% #420 1,650 0 9 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 40 14 54 74.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 41 14 55 74.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 31 12 43 72.1% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1990 — — — — 41 19 60 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1991 3 3 6 50.0% 23 13 36 63.9% — — — — — — — — 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1993 — — — — 19 11 30 63.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1996 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 7 14 21 33.3% 229 112 341 67.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Perez-Roldan Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1590 122.7 — — — — — +35 — 55.0% +0.40 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1810 140.7 — — — — — +62 — 64.3% +0.99 13–4 (76%) 8–7 (53%) 106.8 +3.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1837 152.0 — — — — -321 +113 — 65.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 12–5 (71%) 102.3 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1809 142.5 — — — — -303 +105 — 61.3% +0.93 10–4 (71%) 8–5 (62%) 103.0 +0.62 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1990 1790 146.4 — — — — — +115 — 61.7% +0.72 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) 105.9 +0.84 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1991 1768 144.4 — — — — -256 +86 — 63.0% +1.03 7–6 (54%) 8–5 (62%) 100.4 +0.53 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 1992 1647 130.7 — — — — — +96 — 57.1% +0.64 8–5 (62%) 8–6 (57%) 101.3 +3.10 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 1993 1755 138.4 — — — — — +70 — 59.4% +0.25 7–2 (78%) 11–2 (85%) 112.7 -0.09 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.27
26 1996 1650 104.7 — — — — — +48 — 13.3% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.23 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1933 147.3 — — — — -295 +91 — 61.1% +0.77 71–37 (66%) 69–41 (63%) 111.4 +2.65 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.